1. Alfred Dewayne Brown was convicted for the crime of killing Charles R. Clark and Alfredia Jones during a bungled robbery.
2. Alfred said that he did not kill those two people, and that he was at this girlfriend's house at the time of the murders.
3. The closing argument was heard and the decision was rendered in October 2005.
4. Her article was published May 14th, 2014.
5. Brown's alibi was that he was at his girlfriend's house, and he placed a call to her there.
6. At the original trial, there was no evidence he was actually there, and people claim all sorts of things on death row.
7. A homicide investigator "found" some phone records placing Alfred at his girlfriend's house.
8. Another record showed that the prosecutors had requested these records and said nothing about it.
9. The appeals court has done nothing in response to the recommendation.
10. The author wants the appeals court to make up their mind, hopefully giving him a second chance.
11. I'm hopeful that he makes it out of this alive, however, this is Texas, and I don't think he did.
12. The piece is short, tries to convince you of something, and was written by an editor. This makes it a typical piece.
Your answers are all spot on, except for maybe the last one. The piece is short, but you don't really address the style. How is the piece written? What voice? How are the sentences put together? 98.
ReplyDeleteYour answers are all spot on, except for maybe the last one. The piece is short, but you don't really address the style. How is the piece written? What voice? How are the sentences put together? 98.
ReplyDelete